Can America Clean Up from Its Worst Environmental Disaster? [Contains Photo Slideshow]
By Antrim Caskey, AlterNet. Posted January 5, 2009.
With the breaking of a coal waste dam in Tennessee, environmental and human health is threatened by millions of pounds of toxic chemicals. Tools
Also in Water
How the West's Energy Boom Could Threaten Drinking Water for 1 in 12 Americans
Abrahm Lustgarten
Water: Ethanol's Achilles Heel
Robert Glennon
Global Warming's US Impacts and "Permanent Drying" in the Southwest
Joseph Romm
New Report: Clean Water Protections Are Failing
Bush Administration Covered Up 500+ Blocked Water Pollution Cases
NYC: Gas Drilling Will Raise the Cost of Water by 30 Percent
Abrahm Lustgarten
More stories by Antrim Caskey
Water RSS Feed
Main AlterNet RSS Feed
Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!
Advertisement
Editor's Note: You can watch an incredible photo slideshow of the effects of the coal ash sludge spill at the bottom of this story.
Harriman, TN - On December 26, 2008, the Roane County Codes Enforcement Office condemned three homes along Swan Pond Circle Road in Harriman, Tennessee, four days after 5.4 million cubic yards, more than 1 billion gallons, of coal combustion waste (CCW) slurry surged, "like a tsunami" according to residents, into the confluence of the Emory and Clinch Rivers after breaking a 40-acre holding pond at the Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) Kingston coal-fired power plant.
The Schean family lake house, which they had spent that last 3.5 years restoring from a beaten up lakeside shack, was thrown off its foundation across the road thirty feet. Fifty-three-year-old James Schean was asleep in bed when the earthen retaining wall broke, sending a wave of coal sludge through his home; Schean escaped by kicking out the bedroom window and clamoring out of the house, just as emergency personnel arrived at the scene. Neither his wife nor his daughter were in the house at the time.
DeAnna Copeland, a neighbor of the Scheans, expressed her dismay at the destruction of the Schean lake-house, "every waking moment they were working on that house." The Schean house, the bass boat and James' red pick up truck all lay under a dark grey sludge, which was punctuated with household items, toys, and clothing that had been expelled from the house.
Many of the residents of Harriman and the surrounding river-front properties and forested peninsulas say they moved here to live out the latter part of their lives in a beautiful river setting -- many "cashed in everything" to buy river-front homes, like the Copeland family. As one of the police officers at a checkpoint along Swan Pond Circle Road said, "Sunday night, people went to bed with lake-side property; when they woke up Monday morning, it was gone."
Chris Copeland was startled awake at 12:40 am Monday morning, December 22. Copeland got dressed and drove his car down to the shore and put his high beams on to see what was going on. "I could hear things breaking and popping -- at first I thought it was a storm...I could see what looked like ocean waves going over our cove, then trees and debris," Copeland recalled. "I thought that the Melton Hill Dam had collapsed." Copeland, a fire fighter at the Oak Ridge National Laboratories, immediately called 911.
Copeland was up all night and "hasn't slept very well since," he admitted. Subsequently, his wife DeAnna and two young daughters, have gone to Florida to stay with relatives. Copeland said that he wanted to get his children away from the mess and he was not sure when they would come back.
This is not the first time that the coal ash containment ponds have breached at the Kingston Fossil plant. There have been two in recent years, one in 2003 and in 2006. Danny Collins, the manager of the Rockwood Municipal Airport, said that he'd noticed a green ooze coming from the retention wall of the waste pond for the last year and a half.
But this environmental disaster may be the worst in the country's history and the threats to health and the environment are severe, as the residents are beginning to learn. Clean up crews expressed their shock at the size and scope of the accident. "I ain't seen anything like this ever before," said one worker, who asked not to be identified by name because "TVA told us not to say anything. Fifteen years ago there was a tornado here -- it was nothing compared to this," he explained.
Residents in the affected area expressed frustration at TVA's response to citizens. DeAnna Copeland likened it to going to the emergency room for care and being put in a waiting room. "First they send the receptionist to check on you; next they send the candy striper. We need the doctor!"
In the wake of the spill, Kingston City Councilman Brant Williams called an emergency community meeting to be held at the Kingston Community Center, on Sunday, December 28. Five of the seven council members attended along with the Mayor Troy Beets, who also heads the City council, Ron Kilgore, CEO of TVA and Ron Hall, the Kingston plant manager.
According to Kilgore, 3 homes have been condemned, 42 homes were damaged in some way; at least 63 pieces of equipment are currently engaged in clean up efforts, "24-7." One by one, citizens raised their hands to make comments and ask questions. Mayor Beets handed each person a microphone, which usually ended up back in the hands of TVA CEO Ron Kilgore, who answered questions for hours.
Considering the magnitude of the spill, citizens were almost eerily polite; there was much talk of "not wanting to bash TVA." Some residents affected by the coal sludge spill expressed concern that if they spoke out against TVA that family members who did business with the company could lose their jobs.
Citizens listened to Kilgore enumerate the TVA plan of action: first to ensure public safety, second, to contain the spill, and third, the recovery stage. Kilgore repeatedly described planned efforts to monitor the water, air and soil around the spill but never explained to the approximately 300 people why these precautions were being taken.
He addressed the safety of clean up crews and admitted that he pulled them off task when rains came over the weekend after the spill, "you can imagine that it is kind of dangerous working with this stuff," he said. However, when a citizen later quoted back his statement and questioned health and safety issues, Kilgore said that he was describing the slickness endangering the workers, not the actual content of the spilled waste.
But there may be good reason for alarm. Activists representing United Mountain Defense, River Keepers and Citizen Coal Council distributed information about coal ash and its dangers at the meeting. Stephen Smith of CleanEnergy.org demanded that Kilgore tell the crowd what is in the coal ash. Kilgore refused to answer saying only that, "we are concentrating our efforts on clean up."
Chris Irwin, with United Mountain Defense, spoke to the crowd warning them that this community meeting was "nothing more than a public relations snow job." As reported in the New York Times, December 30, TVA finally revealed an inventory of the Kingston Fossil Plant waste generation in detail : "In just one year, the plant's byproducts included 45,000 pounds of arsenic, 49,000 pounds of lead, 1.4 million pounds of barium, 91,000 pounds of chromium and 140,000 pounds of manganese. Those metals can cause cancer, liver damage and neurological complications, among other health problems. And the holding pond ... contained many decades' worth of these deposits."
Subsequently, independent tests of the water quality at the spill site and downstream, in coordination with Appalachian Voices and the Waterkeeper Alliance's Upper Watauga Riverkeeper Program, were conducted and analyzed this week. The results are frightening. Tests were conducted at the Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry labs at Appalachian State University in Boone, NC. At the Kingston plant's canal intake, the tests revealed arsenic levels 300 times what federal laws allow; all samples contained "elevated levels of arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury , nickel and thallium," according to Appalachian Voices' website.
Dr. Shea Tuberty, Associate Professor of Biology, one of the scientists conducting the tests concluded, "The ecosystems around Kingston and Harriman are going to be in trouble, the aquatic ones for some time, until nature is able to bury these compounds in the environment," said Tuberty. "I don't know how long that will take, maybe generations."
The coal disaster at Kingston has clued Americans in to the real consequences of coal. We use coal-fired power for almost half of our daily electricity use; when you turn on your lights, your plasma TV or laptop computer, you are probably using coal. The coal industry, which has come under sustained attack, especially in the wake of global climate change, is spending tens of millions of dollars on a public relations war to convince Americans that coal is good and clean.
But many residents of Appalachia who live with the daily effects are strenuously opposed. Long before this latest disaster, citizens in the Coal River valley in southern West Virginia have pointed to the threats of massive sludge ponds in their neighborhood: Brushy Fork, which contains 9 billion gallons of sludge and the 2.8 billion gallons that sit above Marsh Fork Elementary School, which according to reports written between 1998 and 2005 by the Mine Safety and Health Administration, is at risk for failure which could fatally impact 1,000 people downstream. From the Coal River Valley -- and across the nation -- the people cry for Marsh Fork Elementary to be moved away from the toxic waste dump which has accrued hundreds of repeated violations. But West Virginia Governor Joe Manchin, III has refused this community's requests. Massey Energy, which runs the operation, assures West Virginians that their dam is safe and inspected regularly. But that is also what TVA assured the people of Kingston.
Clearly corporate responsibility is an issue when it comes to the threats posed by coal. In the case of Kingston, environmental organizations like Greenpeace are calling for criminal charges against TVA. The Southern Alliance for Clean Energy is planning to sue TVA under the Federal Clean Water Act. Additionally, Roane County land developers are suing TVA for $165 million. And many are hoping that the Kingston spill will be the impetus to help Americans commit to the immediate transition away from coal to clean, renewable energy.
See more stories tagged with: global warming, climate change, coal, tennessee, clean coal, mountaintop removing, mining, spill, tva
Antrim Caskey is a Brooklyn-based independent photojournalist whose work focuses on community and social justice issues. Caskey has been reporting on the human and environmental costs of Mountaintop Removal/Valley Fill coal mining since May, 2005.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Appalachia is not "newsworthy" to the MSN
[Report this comment] Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars on Jan 5, 2009 1:34 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as much as you want too this will get little to no traction becuase its in Appalachia thank to a TVA F up (a Federal agency)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
What is dirty, and what is organic
[Report this comment] Posted by: bonzi on Jan 5, 2009 1:40 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, I am not claiming that coal ash sludge is not harmful. The problem is that it is sludge (as opposed to dry ash) that has had years to leach all kinds of ash constituents into water part of it. The main danger from sludge retentions like this is "mechanical" - the sheer force of huge mass of mud suddenly released. Pile of dry ash covered with thin layer of soil and planted with grass would be much safer.
But remember when you are reading in some "sustainable/organic living" blog or magazine about making your own soap the way the pioneers did that the fireplace ash used in the process (or used as fertilizer) is the same as that from the power plant retaining pond. The fact is was not touched by "big corporations" does not make it any safer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» lol Posted by: EinMD
comrade
[Report this comment] Posted by: kinderdominion on Jan 5, 2009 4:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This catastrophe makes me sad and angry. What can we do, those who are not from the area?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: comrade Posted by: EinMD
Accidents happen. It will get cleaned up.
[Report this comment] Posted by: AJR Journal on Jan 5, 2009 4:40 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could it have been prevented? Probably.
Should the TVA be held accountable? Sure.
Is it the end of the World? Absolutely not.
The dike broke, it flooded, nobody was killed, and now it is getting cleaned up. Nobody is at risk of poisoning.
Everything will be all right.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Self-deluded bastardized "conservative". Posted by: maxpayne
» We can PREVENT these disasters, starting NOW Posted by: antrim
» RE: Accidents happen... Rumsfeld Redux Posted by: greenman
» RE: Accidents happen. It will get cleaned up. Posted by: bassey
Just like Hurricane Katrina but this time even more man made than the last.
[Report this comment] Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 5, 2009 5:58 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Glad I don't live there is all I can say. This is what happens when phoney economic "libertarian" policies are given higher priority over sane economic policies and the environment. And thanks to privatization, there'll be no real cleanup.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Nope
[Report this comment] Posted by: RTTEch82 on Jan 5, 2009 6:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really dont think we can. I think we have gone way beyond the point of no return. Sadly.
jess
Privacy Center
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
woodsmoke19
[Report this comment] Posted by: woodsmoke19 on Jan 5, 2009 5:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both Bonzi and AJR Journal appear to be poorly informed.I would assert that the main problem with these impoundments is not the "mechanical"problem when the dam breaks,which can be substantial no doubt,but the contents,the coal combustion waste,that is highly toxic and full of heavy metals,just like the waste that goes up and out the powerplant's smokestack,and the coal itself from which the waste products come.Because the retention ponds are not lined to prevent seepage,the liquid ash sludge seeps into the ground water without any dam breaking.I'm guessing that the ash is stored in the form of sludge so that it doesn't become airborne from the wind,which would be a daily PR problem.Covering dry coal ash with a thin layer of soil would only give the impression of"problem solved"when in fact the ash would then leach into the groundwater.Read the article to see the vast toxins released by this facility,and then multiply the numbers by the hundreds of coal-fired powerplants in this country and around the world. Wood ash and coal ash are completely different sustances and I can't understand why he/she would make this mistaken comparison. As for the comments from AJR Journal,no one is likely to drop dead on the spot from poisoning but the toxins have entered the river system,(read the article,)meaning that cities downstream that get their drinking water from the river will be adding coal waste to the toxins already present in the river water.When it rains,the ash sludge they can't scoop up with backhoes(look at the photos) will continue to wash into the river system;when the ash sludge dries out,it will become airborne and residents will be breathing it(along with the smokestack emissions.) Everything about coal is dirty and poisonous.I live in Appalachia and speak from experience.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
This is Not Good at All...
[Report this comment] Posted by: hooklinesinker on Jan 5, 2009 9:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have a new golf course in my hometown of Chesapeake, VA that was under construction for years. The reason it took so long was the builders were receiving money from a coal plant electrical generator (Dominion Virginia Power) for developing a subgrade of excess flash dust as an underlayment of the course. Then it all hit the fan when the toxic dangers of coal dust (fly ash) came out immediately after the course opened and a statute of limitations for claims expired.
Now, every homeowner whose property surrounds this course is finding out their groundwater (wells) is contaminated with heavy metals. The course owner and the electrical utility reports a chemical was sprayed onto the million cubic tons of fly ash to keep it from "leeching" into groundwater. Now it's been determined that didn't work. The electrical company has offered 8 million to help run city water/sewer to the affected homeowners, and yet the course owner is not offering a thing, so the subgrade of flay ash remains. This is a known hazard but everybody took someone else's word that it was safe without ensuring the accuracy of the statements of those in collusion. Sue the hell out of them!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This is Not Good at All... Posted by: maxpayne
Toxic spill? What toxic spill? Now, back to celebrity rehab news!
[Report this comment] Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 5, 2009 10:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the article:
"The coal disaster at Kingston has clued Americans in to the real consequences of coal."
The lack of reporting on this disaster should also clue all who eventually find out about it in on how it is being covered up by what we not-so-laughingly call "the mainstream media."
After reports on the day of the original break, there has been little or no reporting since on the aftermath of this massive toxic spill, even though this one is many times the size of the Exxon Valdez spill, which was reported on for weeks after it happened.
Is this conspicuous lack of reporting because Coal Country, unlike Alaska, has little tourism and so has been written off as not worth considering, or is it because entrenched dirty energy industries are trying to hold onto their business and profits and have the cooperation of the media to do it?
My money's on the latter; but, either way, it is obvious that the news has been cancelled, and all we get now from the infotainment industry is propaganda and pop culture garbage. It is also obvious that the lack of warning from the media about environmental tragedies such as this could potentially result in the deaths of people, so our MSM shares responsibility with the modern Robber Barons who create these disasters. It is outrageous that they will never be held accountable.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Nuclear generated electricity can replace coal
[Report this comment] Posted by: jsong123 on Jan 5, 2009 10:34 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in case anyone is interested.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Nuclear generated electricity can replace coal Posted by: halg
Age of self responsibility
[Report this comment] Posted by: JFlagg on Jan 5, 2009 10:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you live downstream from a coal fired power plant? If so you are most likely living in a State that has been the focus of many financially well-heeled organizations. They have a variety of names, many have "America" "Freedom" "Environmental" or many other words that would lead you to believe they were formed with the interest of Citizens in mind.
It may be time to take a fresh look at what you are being spoon-fed by energy companies and their many cover organizations.
There are some facts that even those opposed to science and place all their faith in God/Christ and Republicans must come to understand.
Coal is toxic. Mining for coal, burning coal, coal by-product storage all destroy the environment and the health of those that come into contact with it.
If you can see smoke from a coal plant, Move. If you can see or hear a coal mining operation, Move. It is important to note that if either of the two situations exist for you, you are probably living in a State that votes Republican and a majority of the people think that the EPA is a left-wing nutcase organization and should not have any control over business. BTW- Titanium does not vaporize
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Home Top Stories Columnists Video Blogs Discuss RSS/XML About Search Donate Contact Us Advertise
Reproduction of material from any AlterNet pages without written permission is strictly prohibited.
© 2009 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment