tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4063395844855180888.post7167739568586531224..comments2023-10-22T10:51:01.345-05:00Comments on Cool Earth Now: Wetland lot gets reprieve from intense infillaubuniquehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14281865213176006571noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4063395844855180888.post-39417392198041500692008-02-21T12:17:00.000-06:002008-02-21T12:17:00.000-06:00I'm wondering what your point is. Do you think tha...I'm wondering what your point is. Do you think that building fewer homes on the lot will be better for the environment? Do you think this will help preserve an ecologically valuable wetland? It doesn't seem likely. Do you think it is better for the environment to build only, say 5 homes on that lot, and then to use another lot for more homes? According to what I read in the paper, the City Council complained about the "high density" development (11 homes on 2 acres - that would be considered low density in any real city). I didn't read anythign about rain garden requirements. Maybe I missed that part. In any case, I'm sure the NIMBIES have done us all and the environment a valuable service by promoting more urban sprawl.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com